The ranking
Same card as the main ranking. Five facts, the places you can check them, where each studio wins and loses, and the brief it is wrong for.
#1
Top Pick
Loses to Huge on research depth
Best for: Global rollouts, real-time interactive work, high-volume production across many markets
Notable clients: Google, Netflix, Nike, PlayStation, Spotify, Warner Bros, Adidas
Offices
33 countries · London
Typical timeline
Not published
Monks run a single operating model rather than a federation of separately managed offices, which is the specific thing that makes 7,500 people across 33 countries usable rather than merely impressive. Named delivery cities include San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, São Paulo, London, Amsterdam, Stockholm, Dubai, Singapore, and Shanghai. For a brand shipping the same experience localised across a dozen markets simultaneously, nobody else here comes close.
The award record backs the craft claim, with 128 Cannes Lions and over 225 FWA awards. The trade is discipline mix. This is a production and technology organisation first, and the deep research practice that a Huge or a frog can put behind a UX programme is not the centre of gravity.
Skip if
The brief is research-led and open-ended. The model is optimised for execution volume rather than problem definition.
#2
Beats Monks on research depth·Loses to Monks on market coverage
Best for: Enterprise transformation, complex service ecosystems, programmes where design and business strategy are inseparable
Notable clients: Apple, GE, Microsoft, Nike, Disney, Sony, Intel, Visa, UBS
Typical timeline
Not published
Over 2,000 people across eight offices spanning North America and Australia, with design, technology, and business strategy operating on the same programme. Where Monks scales production, frog scales thinking, and that is the meaningful difference between the top two entries here.
The work sits where a design problem and an operating model problem turn out to be the same problem. Scale cuts both ways. Two thousand people is a delivery machine, and the experience is closer to a consultancy engagement than a design collaboration. Verified marketplace reviews are thinner than the client list implies.
Skip if
You need lean execution on a defined product. The structure that makes them capable on transformation makes them heavy on anything smaller.
#3
Beats frog on discipline breadth·Loses to frog on transformation depth
Best for: Large brand programmes where positioning, product, CRM, and campaign have to move together
Notable clients: Google, McDonald's, Four Seasons, Zelle, Brooks Running, P&G
Typical timeline
Not published
Over 1,200 people across 13 offices in North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The discipline coverage is the broadest on this page, with strategy, UX, technology, data, media, and campaign all under one roof, which matters when a brief spans positioning, digital products, CRM, and environmental design at once. Their first client was IKEA, and they led the redesign of New York City's municipal website.
Worth knowing before you commit. Their Glassdoor rating sits at 3.6 across more than 700 employee reviews, which is middling for the category. At this size internal churn tends to surface as team changes mid-engagement, so ask directly how long your named team has been together.
Skip if
You want a focused product design partner. The breadth that serves an integrated programme is overhead on a narrow brief.
#4
Beats Huge on shipping discipline·Loses to Huge on discipline breadth
Best for: Mission-critical digital products that need design and engineering as one team across markets
Notable clients: Apple, Google, Twitter, Beats by Dre, Planned Parenthood, Equinox, Virgin America
Typical timeline
16–24 weeks
The smallest agency here that still clears the multi-market bar, with roughly 450 people across eight offices on three continents. Brooklyn, Portland, São Paulo, Rio, Copenhagen, Belgrade, Los Angeles, and Atlanta all produce work, and the cross-cultural product thinking that comes from teams operating in different digital markets is a real asset rather than a claim.
What separates them from everything above is that the scale has not diluted the craft. Apple Music, the Virgin America booking experience, and Google Arts & Culture shipped as products that performed. Engagements start around $450,000, so the capacity is not cheap.
Skip if
The brief is brand-led, campaign-shaped, or exploratory. The shipping discipline that defines them has nothing to work on.
#5
Beats Work & Co on engineering volume·Loses to Work & Co on craft
Best for: Enterprise platforms where creative and engineering need to be designed as one system
Notable clients: AWS, Microsoft, Marriott, TikTok, Pfizer
Typical timeline
Not published
Over 500 people from a New York base with three further offices, structured around pairing creative work with genuine engineering depth rather than treating build as a downstream phase. The capacity to run several workstreams without subcontracting the hard parts is genuine.
It ranks below the four above on footprint. Four offices is the narrowest geography on this page, which limits the multi-market argument considerably. The marketplace review record is also thin relative to the client list and the price.
Skip if
You need genuine multi-market coverage or you are a smaller team wanting a focused partner.
#6
Beats Code and Theory on price
Best for: Mid-market product programmes needing several teams at once without enterprise rates
Notable clients: sonnen, Corel, PractiTest, DTIQ, Humanitas University
Typical timeline
Not published
The entry point to this category rather than the middle of it, at roughly 100 to 150 people across four Polish cities with global remote delivery. Included because it answers a question the four above cannot, which is how to get parallel-team capacity without enterprise pricing. Design and engineering run inside the same agile cadence.
Clutch carries 63 verified reviews at 4.8, with projects documented from $10,000 for a prototype up to $500,000. That review depth is the strongest on this page, and it is the compensation for the smaller footprint. Four cities in one country is not multi-market delivery in the sense the top three mean it.
Skip if
You need delivery presence in multiple regions or time zones. Everything here runs from one country.